Martin and Brandon

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Fri Nov 18, 2016 1:57 pm

Neither responded to Pat's roll call. Martin sent two MPs this year, the latest in May. Brandon sent three, the latest in August.

Not sure what we want to do here. I'm inclined to keep Brandon, despite his awful trades over the past couple of years. It's a quiet time and he does pop in during the season I feel like.

Martin, not so sure.

Dodgers · Post by **Dodgers** » Sat Nov 19, 2016 11:53 am

I think transactions tell a bigger story and Brandon hasn't made a move since May 1 and Martin made 1 sign and 1 release in August and that's it since February. Did they have significant DL violations as a result of few MPs? I don't see posts about them but maybe their violations were just missed.

My preference is to have GMs that are more engaged than they are, but it feels like we've had a hard time by that measure with new GMs the past couple years.

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Tue Nov 22, 2016 1:08 pm

I agree with Shawn that having 30 engaged, active GMS is best, but that's a tough standard to meet. While Brandon isn't overly active, he at least responds and remains somewhat active. I didn't see any DL violations for him, which has been a problem in the past. At least he was making changes up to August. I would suggest he stay.

As for Martin, he's completely MIA most of the year...and despite having some talent, doesn't trade, make pickups or even send in new MPs. He doesn't respond to messages (email or pm). I'd say it's time for him to go. The challenge, of course, is finding someone in time for the draft with Miami also vacant. Perhaps we'll have to stick to drafting whoever the highest amateur draft pick is for these draft slots if we can't find a GM in time...

Rangers · Post by **Rangers** » Tue Nov 22, 2016 5:49 pm

I can't recall, have we ever asked Martin what his thoughts are as far as being able to be engaged and whether he's into the league, etc.? I don't know him that well, so it would be good to know if he has a priority to spend more time with it at some point, or if it's just not that interesting to him any longer and he is just sort of hanging on by a thread of interest.

He knows his stuff, so you'd wish that he could find enough time for it, since, as you guys said, we're already looking for one.

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:44 pm

Rangers wrote:I can't recall, have we ever asked Martin what his thoughts are as far as being able to be engaged and whether he's into the league, etc.? I don't know him that well, so it would be good to know if he has a priority to spend more time with it at some point, or if it's just not that interesting to him any longer and he is just sort of hanging on by a thread of interest.

He knows his stuff, so you'd wish that he could find enough time for it, since, as you guys said, we're already looking for one.

I don't know if anyone has asked. Honestly, I probably sent him 1-2 PM's and an email or two this year and never got a response.

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:34 pm

Brandon checked in.

I reached out to Martin yesterday, so we'll see what he says.

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:47 pm

I know we still have an open spot, but I think at this point we need to have two.

I sent Martin a PM in late November and he hasn't even opened it yet. I also sent him an email a couple weeks back, but no reply.

Dodgers · Post by **Dodgers** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 9:33 am

I'm fine with us giving Martin the boot.

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 10:24 am

If he's not responding, I'm fine kicking him out.
Is our policy typically to just draft the highest drafted amateur for open slots if there's an open team?

Rangers · Post by **Rangers** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:28 am

Tigers wrote:Is our policy typically to just draft the highest drafted amateur for open slots if there's an open team?

I think so.

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 11:33 am

Yeah, it is.

Padres · Post by **Padres** » Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:36 pm

Needs to go ... I wonder if he will notice ...

Rangers · Post by **Rangers** » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:23 pm

Pat B is right that we need someone to take care of the drops for these until we have replacements:

Who decides the player(s) that get dropped when the pick is made? I think somebody needs to be a standin for both teams. I think I did that one time in the early years when we had no GM for a team at draft time.

I can do the DBacks if needed.

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:00 pm

I can do TB if we need another volunteer. But I don't think we should stray from drafting highest selected (and signed) player. Having a standard procedure seems safer than having a GM interpret who's better than others.

Rangers · Post by **Rangers** » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:10 pm

Tigers wrote:I can do TB if we need another volunteer. But I don't think we should stray from drafting highest selected (and signed) player. Having a standard procedure seems safer than having a GM interpret who's better than others.

Yes, agree here

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Mon Jan 30, 2017 8:48 pm

Do we have any other input on this? Draft is in two days. BP does Arizona's cuts and I do TB's cuts and either Shawn or JP makes the highest draft pick? Are we in agreement?

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:09 pm

Dodgers · Post by **Dodgers** » Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:11 pm

I don't really think it matters too much but why don't you guys post the list of cuts here and we can ratify them so you're not solely on the hook? Highest signed pick seems like the best route to me.

Padres · Post by **Padres** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:23 am

Tigers wrote:I can do TB if we need another volunteer. But I don't think we should stray from drafting highest selected (and signed) player. Having a standard procedure seems safer than having a GM interpret who's better than others.

I also agree.

Padres · Post by **Padres** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:24 am

Tigers wrote:Do we have any other input on this? Draft is in two days. BP does Arizona's cuts and I do TB's cuts and either Shawn or JP makes the highest draft pick? Are we in agreement?

Yes.

Padres · Post by **Padres** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:30 am

Dodgers wrote:I don't really think it matters too much but why don't you guys post the list of cuts here and we can ratify them so you're not solely on the hook? Highest signed pick seems like the best route to me.

The Rays first cut will be easy: Alex Rios

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 8:43 am

Proposed TB cuts:

Alex Rios (hasn't played since 2015)
Ross Detwiler (31, was bad in 2016, unusable projection: 5.26 ERA -0.4 zwar)
Brendan Ryan (35, no longer plus D, -0.4 zwar projection)
Artie Reyes (seems to be a non-prospect, unusable projection (4.97 era 0.1 zwar)
Tom Wilhelmsen 4.58 era projection -0.4 zwar 83 era+ was a disaster last year (6.80 era/6.38 fip)

Others
Kevin Jepsen 4.15 era projection 0 zwar 95 era+ was a disaster last year (5.98 era/6.15 fip) but used to be good
Jesse Hahn (27, seems like a flash in the pan. Was hurt last year, but historically poor k/bb rates. 4.78 era projection, 83 era+, 0.4 zwar)
Jonathan Papelbon (still has no home, zero buzz about him playing this year, but good sim)

I think the first five are easy.

Dodgers · Post by **Dodgers** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 9:10 am

TB cuts are fine with me.

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:39 pm

Gabe has expressed interest in rejoining. He said he misses the league and has more time, and would welcome another chance. He admitted he's fallen off a bit with baseball IQ, and would lean on me (and others) before getting up to speed, especially with the draft.

Rangers · Post by **Rangers** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:49 pm

I'm fine with Gabe rejoining if he promises not to trade Kershaw without getting a great deal.

What's the plan then?