Tebow

[Rangers]

So I think according to our rules we have to revoke this signing. Also might not hurt to add a sentence to actually make something like this legal but until then I believe it's not.

[Padres]

So I think according to our rules we have to revoke this signing. Also might not hurt to add a sentence to actually make something like this legal but until then I believe it's not.

I agree with Brett ... while I enjoyed the commentary affiliated with this signing, Tebow is clearly only eligible to be signed as a draftee in the upcoming draft - or a FA after that.

[Guardians]

I hadn't really thought about it and we probably should have a while ago. After reviewing the rules and given that he was almost but never previously drafted, I think I have to agree. A tiny part of me feels like the fact that it took us a month to realize it maybe could provide some sort of grandfathering, but that sets a bad precedent. I just hate that a team wasted a roster spot for a month on us. But, ultimately, agree he needs to be drafted or signed as a f/a post-draft.

[Rangers]

Sorry, happened while I was out of the country so I never even saw it.

[Padres]

I just hate that a team wasted a roster spot for a month on us.

Look at who signed him ... Bren knows the rules and was just messing with us.

[Guardians]

I just hate that a team wasted a roster spot for a month on us.

Look at who signed him ... Bren knows the rules and was just messing with us.

Haha. Maybe. And, yes, I don't have a ton of sympathy for Bren. But still. And BP, it's not on you to police. We all missed it.

[Dodgers]

Agreed based on 'Players subject to the draft will include any amateur player who has been signed by an MLB organization during the prior calendar year.' clause.