Why leagues should not own one of their teams
- Athletics
- Posts: 1930
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:00 am
- Location: San Diego, CA
- Name: Stephen d'Esterhazy
Why leagues should not own one of their teams
Since three out of the four major sports leagues have ended up controlling one of their league's teams, I figured this may be an interesting topic.
- Athletics
- Posts: 1930
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:00 am
- Location: San Diego, CA
- Name: Stephen d'Esterhazy
No because everyone knew French Canadians are all about their hockey and Olympic Stadium was goofy looking.Twins wrote:Can I offer a write-in for the Expos?
In other news, anyone want to pool up their savings to be part owner of the Mets?
http://www.thepostgame.com/blog/dish/20 ... ship-offer
Surprised John isn't lobbying harder.
Last edited by Athletics on Wed Dec 28, 2011 6:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"My shit doesn't work in the playoffs. My job is to get us to the playoffs. What happens after that is fucking luck."
LAA 11 - 15 331W - 479L
LAA 16 - 20 477W - 333L 17-20 ALW
OAK 21 - 24 297W - 189L 21-22 ALW
LAA 11 - 15 331W - 479L
LAA 16 - 20 477W - 333L 17-20 ALW
OAK 21 - 24 297W - 189L 21-22 ALW