Ian Stewart Eligbility

Moderator: Executive Committee

Post Reply
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 8041
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Ian Stewart Eligbility

Post by Cardinals »

Jag also wanted me to ask about Stewart. Apparently, he reported to the instructional leagues in late September.

Though, this really is moot. Stewart was his second DL violation, and he'll have a penalty on him. But in the event Jag keeps advancing, I guess we should rule on him.
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
User avatar
Reds
Posts: 3712
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:00 am

Post by Reds »

He is still listed on the Colorado Springs DL.

I don't recall ever having used the instructional league as a reason to let a player play in the IBC league.
User avatar
Rangers
Site Admin
Posts: 4048
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Prosper, TX
Name: Brett Perryman

Post by Rangers »

I'd be willing to use FIL participation as evidence for later, but to even do that we need to get actual evidence that he's playing in games, not just working out and rehabbing.
Last edited by Rangers on Tue Oct 04, 2011 3:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Astros
Posts: 3229
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: PHX
Name: Ty Bradley

Post by Astros »

DL is DL, he's out
User avatar
Dodgers
Site Admin
Posts: 5783
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Name: Shawn Walsh

Post by Dodgers »

Isn't this akin to a rehab stint in A ball during the season?
User avatar
Reds
Posts: 3712
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:00 am

Post by Reds »

Dodgers wrote:Isn't this akin to a rehab stint in A ball during the season?
Pretty much
User avatar
Rangers
Site Admin
Posts: 4048
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Prosper, TX
Name: Brett Perryman

Post by Rangers »

Dodgers wrote:Isn't this akin to a rehab stint in A ball during the season?
DL is DL, he's out
I know I'm generally a pest on this late season injury topic, but I feel like we have the potential to be getting back into really inconsistent ground with this kind of thing. I'm not really hung up on this case because I haven't seen that Stewart is obviously healthy and playing, but I'm wary of just dismissing anyone in this situation.

It goes back to the question of consistency versus precision and the fact that it's almost impossible for us to be both consistent and accurate with our evaluations. I might be forgetting a previous resolution, but I just kind of hate the idea of us disallowing someone who is perfectly healthy and is even playing and then allowing a guy who isn't DLed but can barely walk or throw to play because we're not certain that he wouldn't be carried on the bench as a potential pinch hitter or something.

If we're being technical about it and actually saying DLed guys can't play, non-DLed guys can, period, great, I welcome anything that makes this simpler. I don't think we've said anything like that, though, and as long as we're willing to delve into grey areas I think we need to try to be open minded about this kind of situation as well.

Just my two cents, and I still think we should hand this off to a different trio of guys like the TRC, btw.
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 8041
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Post by Cardinals »

It's totally moot on Stewart anyway.

"Ian Stewart will not be able to attend the Rockies' fall instructional league due to lingering wrist issues."
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
Post Reply

Return to “ExCo General”