Darren Oliver/ Waivers

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:15 pm

Nick didn't post in his database corrections that he had Oliver. It was one of the few that I had missed. Anyway, Nils claimed him. Obviously, Nils can't get him especially since Nick just traded for Oliver all of 6 days ago.

The next player on Nils' list was Matos, who I claimed and then traded. I was ahead of Nils anyway. The player after that was Quezada, who Andrew had.

The quickest and easiest resolution I see to this is giving Oliver back to Nick, Quezada to Nils, Brocail to Andrew in the first round and then bumping up the waiver claim since Andrew's list was up and there was nobody after Brocail. Egbert, Cassel and Quezada would all have been taken already. Sorry Andrew for the false hope with Quezada and Brocail, but, this seems to be the easiest and best course of action and I'd like to get this settled tonight.

Anybody here adamantly opposed? I know Shawn and Brett agree with this. Just need one of the other three guys, if not all of you, to speak up on it.

Astros · Post by **Astros** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:16 pm

Works for me

Rangers · Post by **Rangers** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:20 pm

Not only is it quick and easy, it's the way waivers would have run if it had been caught that Oliver was owned.

Nationals · Post by **Nationals** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:23 pm

No worries. I figured getting 2 out of 4 was a bit more than what I could have hoped for.

Padres · Post by **Padres** » Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:10 pm

Appropriately done ...

Nationals · Post by **Nationals** » Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:34 am

Technically, I should still have Victor Diaz since I had an extra spot, but there's no need to bring him back to my roster.