McCann prediction
Moderator: Angels
- Cardinals
- Posts: 8041
- Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Manch Vegas, CT
- Name: John Paul Starkey
Re: McCann prediction
.331/.393/.606 through 40+ games, so you're right he's not a .900 OPS guy but a 1000 OPS guy. Also, he has more BB than K's.RedSox wrote:On the record, I think McCann is much closer to the player he was in 2005 and 2007 than he was in 2006. Some individuals think 2006 is closer to the type of player he'll be.
Me, I say no way. Still a very talented C, but not top 3 and not a .900 OPS guy.
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
- Cardinals
- Posts: 8041
- Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Manch Vegas, CT
- Name: John Paul Starkey
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/p ... atsId=6853Royals wrote:Man I hate backing up Bren, but VMart is only 5 years older, and his level of consistency is much better then McCann's. I really hate to rail on McCann because I think he's a great player - but it's clear that VMart is better right now.
or
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/p ... yerId=6309
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
- Yankees
- Posts: 4538
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 1:00 am
- Location: Fulshear, TX
- Name: Brett Zalaski
- Contact:
Well the argument was that VMart was the better player going into this past off-season because he had been more consistent then McCann - meaning if a GM had to take one going into 2008 then they'd probably have taken V-Mart. At no point was I arguing McCann wasn't a talented player, I was arguing that V-Mart was more consistent - which was rather true at the time...I think that still remains a pretty logical argument for time and place.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/p ... atsId=7026
And I'd say Cliff Lee still looks PFG at this point...but I never said he'd be Sandy Koufax.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/p ... atsId=7026
And I'd say Cliff Lee still looks PFG at this point...but I never said he'd be Sandy Koufax.