Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 3:59 pm
That was a truly bad joke, then. My 'your sense of humor is totally stunted' remains in place.
I'm with you in giving Marvel the benefit of the doubt, but Ant-Man seems pretty dumb. I've never read comics, but I'm really into all the movies. Probably going to wait to On Demand that one. As for Guardians, that was my favorite Marvel movie so far, and by a good bit.Padres wrote:Yup, great flick. As skeptical as I am about this astonishingly stupid sounding Ant-Man movie, I've got to give Marvel the benefit of the doubt on it.Nationals wrote:Fair play. Great use...Guardians of the Galaxy is pretty amazing.
No joke.Rockies wrote:LOL.. where's a Like Button when we need it?
My favorite:Padres wrote:Oh, and this one...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/24/sport ... .html?_r=0
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2015/01/20/s ... rd-levels/Cardinals wrote: The NFL conveniently destroyed all the Spygate tapes. Wonder why? Goodell is such a fine, upstanding guy, surely he wasn't trying to hide anything.
The most forgotten part of the “SpyGate scandal” is the fact that Goodell played the videos on a loop for reporters at the press conference when he announced his punishment. The reporters got to watch the footage on a loop prior to Goodell’s stepping to the podium. (I will always remember this, because the NFL Network’s Rich Eisen cracked one of the better jokes in sports TV history. It was, essentially, “This is the first time ever that a journalist is watching a video in a hotel but doesn’t have to pay $9.99 an hour for it.” What a line, Rich.)
Perpetuating the idea that the footage never saw the light of day is something that is routinely brought up by obsessed Steelers fans who still feel cheated from 2001 and 2004 (even though the Patriots won in ’01 with a blocked field goal and punt return and ’04 in a 41-27 romp), not something that a professional writer ought to spread.
Cardinals wrote:I'm sure every team tailors their game balls to fit the needs of the quarterback, just like a grounds crew has the mound the way their pitchers like it, but when 11 out of 12 balls are deflated that much, given the conditions where that gives you a sizable advantage, and given the history of the franchise with skirting the rules, the hammer is coming down. If you think Bob Kraft is going to do shit then you need to take your homer glasses off. Bellicheck could murder someone in the post game handshake and he wouldn't bat an eye
Each team provides their own balls to be used by their offense only.Orioles wrote:I love taking any opportunity to take a shot at Tom Brady's stupid face and the Pats, but this kinda seems like a stretch. There's no way the Pats can control which ball enters the game at any given time, so Brady and Luck should have been throwing the same balls, which may have been a little under pressure and supposedly easier to throw/catch. I kind of find it hard to believe this only works for Brady and his receivers but nobody else. It's conceivable the Pats intentionally filled the balls to the lowest end of the tolerance for pressure, the refs checked the pressure indoors, then the balls were brought outside where the drop in temperature brought the pressure below the allowable check pressure.
You see this kind of stuff in racing all the time. Teams find ambiguities in the rules and stretch them as far as they can. It doesn't mean they cheated, it just means perhaps the rules need to be redefined.
Yep, pretty much.Orioles wrote:It's conceivable the Pats intentionally filled the balls to the lowest end of the tolerance for pressure, the refs checked the pressure indoors, then the balls were brought outside where the drop in temperature brought the pressure below the allowable check pressure.
You see this kind of stuff in racing all the time. Teams find ambiguities in the rules and stretch them as far as they can. It doesn't mean they cheated, it just means perhaps the rules need to be redefined.
Ah, I see. I guess I have no idea what I'm talking about, but complaining about ball pressure seems pretty similar to complaining about how far up a bat somebody has pine tar...Dodgers wrote:Each team provides their own balls to be used by their offense only.Orioles wrote:I love taking any opportunity to take a shot at Tom Brady's stupid face and the Pats, but this kinda seems like a stretch. There's no way the Pats can control which ball enters the game at any given time, so Brady and Luck should have been throwing the same balls, which may have been a little under pressure and supposedly easier to throw/catch. I kind of find it hard to believe this only works for Brady and his receivers but nobody else. It's conceivable the Pats intentionally filled the balls to the lowest end of the tolerance for pressure, the refs checked the pressure indoors, then the balls were brought outside where the drop in temperature brought the pressure below the allowable check pressure.
You see this kind of stuff in racing all the time. Teams find ambiguities in the rules and stretch them as far as they can. It doesn't mean they cheated, it just means perhaps the rules need to be redefined.
Yup, see the Eli Manning article above.Dodgers wrote:Each team provides their own balls to be used by their offense only.Orioles wrote:I love taking any opportunity to take a shot at Tom Brady's stupid face and the Pats, but this kinda seems like a stretch. There's no way the Pats can control which ball enters the game at any given time, so Brady and Luck should have been throwing the same balls, which may have been a little under pressure and supposedly easier to throw/catch. I kind of find it hard to believe this only works for Brady and his receivers but nobody else. It's conceivable the Pats intentionally filled the balls to the lowest end of the tolerance for pressure, the refs checked the pressure indoors, then the balls were brought outside where the drop in temperature brought the pressure below the allowable check pressure.
You see this kind of stuff in racing all the time. Teams find ambiguities in the rules and stretch them as far as they can. It doesn't mean they cheated, it just means perhaps the rules need to be redefined.
Hey Breny/Toner (haven't decided the best name for your co-gm brohood),Padres wrote:Yup, see the Eli Manning article above.Dodgers wrote:Each team provides their own balls to be used by their offense only.Orioles wrote:I love taking any opportunity to take a shot at Tom Brady's stupid face and the Pats, but this kinda seems like a stretch. There's no way the Pats can control which ball enters the game at any given time, so Brady and Luck should have been throwing the same balls, which may have been a little under pressure and supposedly easier to throw/catch. I kind of find it hard to believe this only works for Brady and his receivers but nobody else. It's conceivable the Pats intentionally filled the balls to the lowest end of the tolerance for pressure, the refs checked the pressure indoors, then the balls were brought outside where the drop in temperature brought the pressure below the allowable check pressure.
You see this kind of stuff in racing all the time. Teams find ambiguities in the rules and stretch them as far as they can. It doesn't mean they cheated, it just means perhaps the rules need to be redefined.
This was a rule change the last few years, it used to be that both played from the same pool, but a group of QBs, led by Peyton Manning and Tom Brady, petitioned the rules committee to allow them to condition their own balls.
This is why Aaron Rodgers is able to overinflate his balls and Eli spends months prepping his to be ready for a game. It's a non-issue, everyone adjusts their balls to their own comfort levels and the officials look the other way. Until some dumbass coach makes a stink, not realizing the effect it will have on his own team and QB (and let's be honest, Pagano, like Mangini, isn't the brightest bulb on the coaching tree, if you'll pardon the mixed metaphors). Even the Brad Johnson stuff is a non-issue, since everyone played with those same balls.
If the balls were somehow adjusted AFTER the officials approved them, then that is a different story. But that's pretty tough as the officials have possession until they are given to the ball carriers, who only give the balls out to the officials during the game. Even then, the officials are still handling every ball when it enters play.
Unless there was tampering after the officials approved the balls, dropping the hammer on the Pats but not every other team that conditions, overinflates or underinflates their balls is a pretty major injustice.
And none of that changes that the Colts sucked ass on Sunday. As the Indy sportswriter noted, the Pats could have been using a hockey puck or a beach ball and still whupped them.
Yeah, but you don't actually know that they doctored the balls. You're just assuming that they are. Florio has a good article on it today on PFT here: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... m_tags%20=Mariners wrote:While it obviously did not have an affect on the outcome of Sunday's game, this will be yet another black mark on Belichick's regime. It just goes to show that Belichick will do anything to win.
The intent is obvious. They got caught. Make sure the punishment stings sufficiently and then move on and fix the rule so that it won't happen again. It is just stupid to allow each team to provide their own balls. Just like in baseball, the league should provide the balls and both teams should play with the same ones. No exceptions.
Pirates wrote:Yeah, but you don't actually know that they doctored the balls. You're just assuming that they are. Florio has a good article on it today on PFT here: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... m_tags%20=Mariners wrote:While it obviously did not have an affect on the outcome of Sunday's game, this will be yet another black mark on Belichick's regime. It just goes to show that Belichick will do anything to win.
The intent is obvious. They got caught. Make sure the punishment stings sufficiently and then move on and fix the rule so that it won't happen again. It is just stupid to allow each team to provide their own balls. Just like in baseball, the league should provide the balls and both teams should play with the same ones. No exceptions.
I agree though. The league should provide the footballs for both teams, and that's that.
Edit: if the Pats did doctor the balls, then yeah, there should be a punishment.
Yes, he'll do anything to win. Including EXACTLY what the other QB's and coaches in the NFL are doing, doctoring footballs to make them easier to grip and increase scoring. This is what the NFL wants!Mariners wrote:While it obviously did not have an affect on the outcome of Sunday's game, this will be yet another black mark on Belichick's regime. It just goes to show that Belichick will do anything to win.
So did Aaron Rodgers when he admited to overinflating the football. So did Eli when he admitted to all the conditioning he has his folks do. So did the Vikings, who stick their balls in an oven before giving them to the refs to inspect. You're going to hit every team that does this with the same fine, right? And if you think every other QB in the league, including Russell Wilson, isn't doing the same thing, you're kidding yourself. These are highly competitive men who will ALL do everything they can to win.The intent is obvious. They got caught.
Slightly different situations. Baseballs are used fundamentally differently than the balls in any other sport. And you're missing the point that the NFL wants its QB's to be as comfortable with their balls as possible to promote scoring.It is just stupid to allow each team to provide their own balls. Just like in baseball, the league should provide the balls and both teams should play with the same ones. No exceptions.