Post-5th rounders

Moderator: Executive Committee

Post Reply

Should the draft end after five rounds?

Poll ended at Thu Oct 27, 2016 8:49 pm

Yes, you can sign whoever you want after the last pick
3
60%
No, people should still be able to add draft picks and extend the draft
2
40%
 
Total votes: 5

User avatar
Rangers
Site Admin
Posts: 3935
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Prosper, TX
Name: Brett Perryman

Post-5th rounders

Post by Rangers »

Here is the poll on extra picks past the fifth round.
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 7779
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Post by Cardinals »

I don't think it's right for a GM to be able to hold the draft hostage as more information can come out. For example, I have what, one draft pick this year as of now?

If I wanted to add four extra picks, I could take four extra days and prevent the draft pool from being signed as free agents. That's not ok.
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
User avatar
Rangers
Site Admin
Posts: 3935
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Prosper, TX
Name: Brett Perryman

Post by Rangers »

3-2 vote means that we don't change this, right?
User avatar
Guardians
Posts: 4672
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Name: Pat Gillespie

Post by Guardians »

Rangers wrote:3-2 vote means that we don't change this, right?
The rule would be amended to say that gms can not add additional picks past the fifth round. We draft five rounds, that's it. Currently, picks can be added in perpetuity.
User avatar
Rangers
Site Admin
Posts: 3935
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Prosper, TX
Name: Brett Perryman

Post by Rangers »

Tigers wrote:
Rangers wrote:3-2 vote means that we don't change this, right?
The rule would be amended to say that gms can not add additional picks past the fifth round. We draft five rounds, that's it. Currently, picks can be added in perpetuity.
That's what would happen if the vote to change the rule had passed. Since you and Jim voted against changing it, though, I don't think that we can change it.
User avatar
Guardians
Posts: 4672
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Name: Pat Gillespie

Post by Guardians »

Rangers wrote:
Tigers wrote:
Rangers wrote:3-2 vote means that we don't change this, right?
The rule would be amended to say that gms can not add additional picks past the fifth round. We draft five rounds, that's it. Currently, picks can be added in perpetuity.
That's what would happen if the vote to change the rule had passed. Since you and Jim voted against changing it, though, I don't think that we can change it.
I'm confused. The question was should the draft end after five rounds. The vote was 3-2 in favor of ending the draft after five rounds. Therefore, the draft ends after five rounds, correct? Currently, the draft does not end after five rounds.
User avatar
Rangers
Site Admin
Posts: 3935
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Prosper, TX
Name: Brett Perryman

Post by Rangers »

I'm looking for something more definitive but basically I believe that we decided at the beginning that we have to have four votes to pass something new. Here is the first thread I found on it but there should be something somewhere that states the standard more clearly. I thought that it was in the IBC rules but it's not. We should probably add a sentence on it.

viewtopic.php?t=251
User avatar
Guardians
Posts: 4672
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Name: Pat Gillespie

Post by Guardians »

Aaah...wasn't aware. I think majority makes sense since there's an odd number of members, but whatever you guys want to do.
User avatar
Padres
Site Admin
Posts: 4416
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Wells, Maine
Name: Jim Berger

Post by Padres »

I will make this easy ... I have changed my mind.
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 7779
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Post by Cardinals »

Jim coming in with the Staples Easy Button.
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
User avatar
Rangers
Site Admin
Posts: 3935
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Prosper, TX
Name: Brett Perryman

Post by Rangers »

Ok, I think our draft related updates will be:

1. Draft will begin Feb 1, all players must have signed prior to Feb 1 to be eligible. We will update the IBC rules to account for this change.
2. The draft will end after the 5th round, no waivers after the draft.
3. The Tim Tebow signing is voided as it violates the current draft rules.
User avatar
Padres
Site Admin
Posts: 4416
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Wells, Maine
Name: Jim Berger

Post by Padres »

..."no waivers after the draft."

Not quite sure about this phrase. Is this NO ADDITIONAL DRAFT SELECTIONs because they are often waivers, i.e., players needed to be released after the draft.
User avatar
Rangers
Site Admin
Posts: 3935
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Prosper, TX
Name: Brett Perryman

Post by Rangers »

Makes sense, yeah, we'll have to use more specific language.
User avatar
Padres
Site Admin
Posts: 4416
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Wells, Maine
Name: Jim Berger

Post by Padres »

Beginning in 2017, the IBC Annual Rookie Draft will start February 1. All players must have signed to a contract by a MLB organization prior to February 1 to be eligible to be drafted. Players eligible for the draft may only be signed in the IBC by means of the draft until the conclusion of the draft. The draft will end after 5 rounds at which point players eligible for the draft may be signed in the IBC via the normal signing process. We will update the IBC rules to account for these changes.

Note: The Tim Tebow signing is voided as it violates the current draft rules.
Last edited by Padres on Sun Oct 30, 2016 6:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Dodgers
Site Admin
Posts: 5771
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Name: Shawn Walsh

Post by Dodgers »

Sorry, missed the voting period apparently but I would have voted for "Yes".
Post Reply

Return to “ExCo General”