Z/Chris Shaw

Moderator: Executive Committee

Post Reply
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 8041
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Z/Chris Shaw

Post by Cardinals »

Z says he picked the wrong Chris Shaw because he didn't realize there were two with the same name in the draft, and he'd like to change his pick.

I'm not inclined to allow it, but he asked me to open a thread. If he took the time to do about a half second more research and scroll or read the draft page, then this wouldn't have happened.
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 8041
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Post by Cardinals »

His argument also is "I could've lied and gotten my pick back like d'Esterhazy and Pat G."
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
User avatar
Nationals
Posts: 1904
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 8:00 am
Location: West Hartford, CT
Name: Ian Schnaufer

Post by Nationals »

That's a pretty weak reasoning...granted, Pat's rationale was also pretty weak (d'Esterhazy's mistake at least seems plausible).

This seems like he's trying get out of a hasty/sloppy pick. I don't think so.
User avatar
Padres
Site Admin
Posts: 4822
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Wells, Maine
Name: Jim Berger

Post by Padres »

I would be okay if we let him change it after 150 picks and before the "extra" rounds ... I personally do not believe he would even know he picked the wrong Shaw if another GM (I believe it was JT) had not pointed out it out to him. He would eventually discovered it and cut the guy and replaced with another player - a 14 or 15 if his roster make-up demanded.

I would also be okay if we just said no and he drops the guy and drafts a replacement in the extra round.

The first proposal simply guarantees him pick 151 ... otherwise he could do it at 153 (I think) by simply asking for an extra pick and then dropping his Shaw.

I do not believe we should let him change it a day later ... Steve and Pat both "owned up" to their mistakes immediately.
User avatar
Astros
Posts: 3229
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: PHX
Name: Ty Bradley

Post by Astros »

Jim's proposal sounds good to me
User avatar
Rangers
Site Admin
Posts: 4048
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Prosper, TX
Name: Brett Perryman

Post by Rangers »

I agree, the two options I see are pick 121 and pick 151.
User avatar
Dodgers
Site Admin
Posts: 5783
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Name: Shawn Walsh

Post by Dodgers »

I don't really see any benefit to 151 vs just having him use his natural 153. That way we're not establishing precedent for someone who might be pick 27 instead of 3. Ultimately guys need to be responsible for who they are picking. The only reason I was okay with Pat and Steve were that they immediately posted the mistake.
Post Reply

Return to “ExCo General”