2015 Draft Discussion

Rockies · Post by **Rockies** » Wed Jan 06, 2016 6:06 pm

Great idea.. maybe I'll waste my 5th round in this weak draft on drafting myself.. but I wont make the roster crunch so I'll cut myself immediately.

Dodgers · Post by **Dodgers** » Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:50 pm

RedSox wrote:RedSox draft Kim 15-Soo-hyun with Pick #26

Kind of feel like we should stick the Sawx with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Soo-hyun instead of changing the name to http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159845824 ... un-soo-kim

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:57 pm

Dodgers wrote:
RedSox wrote:RedSox draft Kim 15-Soo-hyun with Pick #26
Kind of feel like we should stick the Sawx with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Soo-hyun instead of changing the name to http://m.mlb.com/news/article/159845824 ... un-soo-kim

Agree

RedSox · Post by **RedSox** » Wed Jan 06, 2016 9:06 pm

I noticed it, but gave your queue work the benefit of the doubt.

Giants · Post by **Giants** » Wed Jan 06, 2016 10:53 pm

Thanks to Steven and Jason I'll be awhile. Sorry guys, was sure one of them would make it!

Giants · Post by **Giants** » Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:24 pm

Or I could just say fuck it and pick the name I recognize. Happy drafting all.

Rockies · Post by **Rockies** » Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:26 pm

Dang, was hoping he might fall..

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:58 pm

Hey guys, just a heads up. I really had my heart set on Dansby Swanson at #31 and really don't know what to do now. There's just no players from which to choose. I'm probably going to need a full 24 hours...

Rangers · Post by **Rangers** » Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:26 pm

Rockies wrote:Dang, was hoping he might fall..

Me too

Rockies · Post by **Rockies** » Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:29 pm

Rangers wrote:
Rockies wrote:Dang, was hoping he might fall..
Me too

Was hoping the guy you picked might fall too.. thanks dude.

Rangers · Post by **Rangers** » Thu Jan 07, 2016 10:39 pm

Rockies wrote:
Rangers wrote:
Rockies wrote:Dang, was hoping he might fall..
Me too
Was hoping the guy you picked might fall too.. thanks dude.

Well hopefully we're all right about these guys we all like. The 20's went pretty much right off my board, unfortunately for me, and sounds like I wasn't alone.

Rockies · Post by **Rockies** » Thu Jan 07, 2016 11:30 pm

Sounds like it. Well, I've got about 20 guys in my queue/on my list.. so I hope there's at least 1 of them there before my next pick.

Rockies · Post by **Rockies** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 1:44 pm

JP didn't take Plummer? Shocking.

Athletics · Post by **Athletics** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 1:57 pm

Rockies wrote:JP didn't take Plummer? Shocking.

Saving him for Aaron?

Astros · Post by **Astros** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:37 pm

Id have took him

Padres · Post by **Padres** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 2:43 pm

Cardinals wrote:Id have took him

I had another OF pegged for that pick as I was sure JP would select Plummer before me but I was pleasantly surprised and couldn't pass him up.

Rockies · Post by **Rockies** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:00 pm

Surprised he lasted that long, honestly. Now, who will Bren pick and how long will he take?

Mariners · Post by **Mariners** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:27 pm

Cardinals wrote:Id have took him

I assumed you'd take him at 17, not Riley.

Astros · Post by **Astros** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:48 pm

DBacks wrote:
Cardinals wrote:Id have took him
I assumed you'd take him at 17, not Riley.

I'm not a homer when it comes to the draft. I took Luke Weaver in the middle of round 2 last year but prior to that the only time I'd ever taken a Cardinal before the 5th round was Matt Adams in the 3rd in 2009

RedSox · Post by **RedSox** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 6:10 pm

Rockies wrote:Surprised he lasted that long, honestly. Now, who will Bren pick and how long will he take?

If you click on the Draft tab, the Padres have an asterisk. I assume this means Bren is on auto but with no players in his queue.

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 6:24 pm

Thanks. I let Bren know.

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:11 pm

As for Plummer, if Martinez wasn't there, then Plummer was my pick. It wasn't easy picking a Cub over a Card, but I like Martinez' power profile more and it's hard to argue with the power Chicago's produced lately.

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:22 pm

It was down to Betts and Martinez for me. The overwhelming case for Martinez is Theo's genius, but after reading some mixed reports, I decided to pass. I could see it being a bad pass for sure. But I think Betts is the best catcher in the draft that would have been top of the first round had he not needed surgery. So, I'm OK waiting it out to see him start developing later next summer.
Matuella was my first target.

Giants · Post by **Giants** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 7:26 pm

Then you'll probably really hate to know that I was 50/50 between Matuella and Martinez at the end. If he'd honored his commitment to the Giants then who knows...

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:06 pm

Giants wrote:Then you'll probably really hate to know that I was 50/50 between Matuella and Martinez at the end. If he'd honored his commitment to the Giants then who knows...

Truly happy with Betts. He was on my short list all along. I just had hoped Matuella would fall, but both are high ceiling guys with injuries.