Dan's deleted post

[Angels]

Dan, even though you have argued extensively again my trade, I have mentioned several times I respect every GMs opinion and don't hold it against you. I was able to copy and paste your deleted post. Sent it to you in a pm. Good luck to you.
Kelly CLE

[Cardinals]

swell move. hats off to you.

[Orioles]

Thanks bro. Very admirable of you, considering my position on your deal. I really appreciate it.

[BlueJays]

Thanks everyone. I'd like to echo those sentiments and again send apologies if the tone of my post was condesending and to apologize to those I've said things I shouldn't have(JP in particular - we're both stubborn as mules, sorry bro.) - I still enjoy everyone and everything this league is about. Its not always smooth sailing, and sometimes I get a bit more wrapped up and invested in this thing than I should, or is necessary. So apologies all around.

I'd like to ask everyone to calm down and just focus on the vote thats coming up, abide by the established rules - I think these very rules were actually established due to me and a previous trade, ironically.

I'd also like to throw out a suggestion - if someone wants to put a trade to a league vote - simply state "I object to the trade" and nothing more. No more discussions like this, that get out of hand. once 5 statements or whatever the requirement is are made in a simple "object" then we can do the even keeled presentation of the debate. Hopefully, it would avoid this kind of shit in the future. And, anything not following said guidlines - gets deleted

Anyway, I'm out - gonna go see semi-pro foo's!

[Rays]

Seconded (fourthed?) I'm glad the post was recovered and did attempt to do so after I deleted it and it was mentioned as the precursor to the official "veto" argument. that said, it still shouldn't have been made in the first place.