Page 1 of 1

Roster issues to be addressed

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:04 pm
by Guardians
The draft is over; let's get rosters fixed.

Houston Astros -- fixed
Atlanta Braves -- fixed
San Diego Padres -- fixed
San Francisco Giants -- fixed
New York Yankees -- fixed
Pittsburgh Pirates -- fixed
Seattle Mariners -- 49 players, but only 8 on draft roster

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 8:30 pm
by Padres
Also Mariners ... 49 players with 8 draftees.

Note ... teams short of draftees can only add "15" players until all teams can add more "16" players.

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:39 pm
by Guardians
Thanks Jim. Was looking on my phone, so figured I'd miss something.

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 9:56 pm
by Giants
My bad guys. Fixed. However suggest that next year since we have no more 6th rounders that guys in my spot (conforming roster but non conforming draft roster) should have to fix it once we can sign 16 guys, i don't mind holding Bolt but I'm probably going to cut him again for a 16 anyway once that window opens

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:24 pm
by Dodgers
Giants wrote:My bad guys. Fixed. However suggest that next year since we have no more 6th rounders that guys in my spot (conforming roster but non conforming draft roster) should have to fix it once we can sign 16 guys, i don't mind holding Bolt but I'm probably going to cut him again for a 16 anyway once that window opens
What was your roster before cuts? Conforming roster and non-conforming draft roster doesn't seem possible to me.

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:41 am
by Giants
It's possible because the 14 guys were still sitting on my draft roster (I miscounted and thought I'd have 10 15/16 guys).

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:08 am
by BlueJays
Might be the first year that I'm not on that list.

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 9:22 am
by Dodgers
Giants wrote:It's possible because the 14 guys were still sitting on my draft roster (I miscounted and thought I'd have 10 15/16 guys).
I wouldn't call that a conforming roster, you'd have 41 non-draftees. The timing for when the 14- players become non-draftees is tricky, I don't switch them over until after the draft because if I did it earlier you'd have to drop ~5 immediately in order to sign anyone else.

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:31 am
by Rockies
Dodgers wrote:
Giants wrote:It's possible because the 14 guys were still sitting on my draft roster (I miscounted and thought I'd have 10 15/16 guys).
I wouldn't call that a conforming roster, you'd have 41 non-draftees. The timing for when the 14- players become non-draftees is tricky, I don't switch them over until after the draft because if I did it earlier you'd have to drop ~5 immediately in order to sign anyone else.
I understand why, but in Jake's defense I also miscounted hence why I ended up dropping Alex Call after drafting him.. It happens.

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:15 am
by Giants
The reason I mention it is that if you go into (for example) the 2016 draft with fewer 15- players than you have picks and there's a few days that pass between the end of the draft and the waiver date you're forced to make cuts and hold empty roster spots that could have gone to draft picks in past years. Minor point and not a huge deal at all just a thought.

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2017 8:33 pm
by Dodgers
Giants wrote:The reason I mention it is that if you go into (for example) the 2016 draft with fewer 15- players than you have picks and there's a few days that pass between the end of the draft and the waiver date you're forced to make cuts and hold empty roster spots that could have gone to draft picks in past years. Minor point and not a huge deal at all just a thought.
I don't really agree. It's not 50 players total, it's 40 players and 10 players from the last 2 drafts. Just because you don't have 10 players from the last 2 drafts doesn't mean you should be able to keep more than 40 other players.

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:56 am
by WhiteSox
Yankees roster is valid.

Isn't it time to bring up the discussion about removing the draft roster all together...

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:20 pm
by Padres
Yankees wrote:Yankees roster is valid.

Isn't it time to bring up the discussion about removing the draft roster all together...
Jag has - unsuccessfully - in the past.

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 3:57 pm
by Reds
WhiteSox wrote:
Yankees wrote:Yankees roster is valid.

Isn't it time to bring up the discussion about removing the draft roster all together...
Jag has - unsuccessfully - in the past.
It's been brought up many times, and shot down.

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 6:24 pm
by Giants
And while we're at it we'd also like to add 5 roster spots

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 6:26 pm
by Rockies
Giants wrote:And while we're at it we'd also like to add 5 roster spots
I'm all for it.. 5 more spots!

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 8:56 pm
by Cubs
Amen, word! Make it 10.

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 9:58 pm
by Guardians
The natives are restless...calm down, everyone. You can bug JP with all this nonsense when he returns.