Liriano still available
Posted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 2:10 pm
Really, really, really frustrated.
I just spent over an hour making a post with all the contending teams rotations, and where Francisco Liriano's projection fit within all those rotations.
My computer is a POS (and not even that old) so I kept having to click 'Website recovery', and the last time it did not recover and I lost my work.
So, long story short, outside of the Tigers & Phillies, Liriano's projection fit anywhere from Ace > #3 in comparison to contending teams other starters.
Bottom line, I'm a bit surprised more teams have not tried a little harder in regards to possibly acquiring a rotation asset for the stretch run & playoffs (sans the Cards, who tried a tad).
Liriano is not having a good year, but will still have a 2017 projection that will fit into 99% of teams rotations, offering more than a 'rent-a-pitcher'.
LH Liriano's projection - 3.19 ERA, 175 K's > 166.1 IP (9.5 K9) 114 ERA+, .223 BAA, 1.23 WHIP, 3.4 RC27
I just spent over an hour making a post with all the contending teams rotations, and where Francisco Liriano's projection fit within all those rotations.
My computer is a POS (and not even that old) so I kept having to click 'Website recovery', and the last time it did not recover and I lost my work.
So, long story short, outside of the Tigers & Phillies, Liriano's projection fit anywhere from Ace > #3 in comparison to contending teams other starters.
Bottom line, I'm a bit surprised more teams have not tried a little harder in regards to possibly acquiring a rotation asset for the stretch run & playoffs (sans the Cards, who tried a tad).
Liriano is not having a good year, but will still have a 2017 projection that will fit into 99% of teams rotations, offering more than a 'rent-a-pitcher'.
LH Liriano's projection - 3.19 ERA, 175 K's > 166.1 IP (9.5 K9) 114 ERA+, .223 BAA, 1.23 WHIP, 3.4 RC27