IBC

Have we relaxed the league rule that requires no more than 40 players unless they are inactive draftees from the last two drafts?

I think the issue is Shawn hasn't gotten around to moving rosters around. Quite a few 14/15 guys have projections, so they're not showing up on the draft roster.

Reds wrote:Have we relaxed the league rule that requires no more than 40 players unless they are inactive draftees from the last two drafts?

why do we have this rule again?

Primarily to annoy the GMs who always complain about it

..oh - that's good. I thought there was a logical answer such as trying to do our best attempt at having an actual 40-man roster.

Why not just make it 55 man rosters, no draft roster spots

Yankees wrote:Why not just make it 55 man rosters, no draft roster spots

Make it 60 or add another year of protection, and eliminate the can't be used in SIM rule - no need for a penalty for drafting well.

Cubs wrote:

Yankees wrote:Why not just make it 55 man rosters, no draft roster spots

Make it 60 or add another year of protection, and eliminate the can't be used in SIM rule - no need for a penalty for drafting well.

I'm for any of these over the current one but we've lost the vote each time a change to rosters has been presented.

Tigers wrote:I think the issue is Shawn hasn't gotten around to moving rosters around. Quite a few 14/15 guys have projections, so they're not showing up on the draft roster.

Just moved all the '13 guys to Inactive status.

Rangers wrote:I'm for any of these over the current one but we've lost the vote each time a change to rosters has been presented.

That's because there's about as much need for an expanded roster as there is for an expanded draft.