Where are the boxes?
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:32 pm
Sorry... I've wanted to be able to do that for a LONG time...
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:03 pm
The boxes are up douchebag. Since we had to wait for your/Jake's vote last night we didn't get them done until this morning and I put them up as soon as I got back from class.
Mets split with Braves
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:08 pm
Are you kidding me ... the Mets beat the Braves on 9/11 to go 3 - 14 against them this year. Maybe this new system will will work - just kidding of course!
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:45 pm
9-7 0 --- 22 Bonds to first on an error by the shortstop Jeter (CBFBFX)
9-7 0 1-- 10 Polanco lined out to right (BX)
9-7 1 1-- 02 Lee,D flied out to left (CCX)
9-7 2 1-- 21 Ruggiano lined a single up the middle, Bonds to second
(CBBX)
Gross pinch running for Ruggiano
9-7 2 12- 21 Reynolds homered to left, Bonds scored, Gross scored
(BCBX)
Against the great Mariano? How many times it take you to get that result BP, 73,502? Get me a new simmer!
You got lucky there bish!
9-7 0 1-- 10 Polanco lined out to right (BX)
9-7 1 1-- 02 Lee,D flied out to left (CCX)
9-7 2 1-- 21 Ruggiano lined a single up the middle, Bonds to second
(CBBX)
Gross pinch running for Ruggiano
9-7 2 12- 21 Reynolds homered to left, Bonds scored, Gross scored
(BCBX)
Against the great Mariano? How many times it take you to get that result BP, 73,502? Get me a new simmer!
You got lucky there bish!
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 2:51 pm
Hey, fancy that, an error by Jeter...
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:32 pm
Did the MP's get put in? I sent it in so long ago, I don't remember what changes I made.
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:44 pm
Of course they got put in, we wouldn't have simmed otherwise. That would be a dick move.
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 1:30 am
Damn, it's nice seeing these go up reguarly
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 11:47 am
It's even better not having to do them 
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 12:00 am
So do you take back your little bitchfest from earlier this week?
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 12:34 am
On this subject, Shawn is out most of the weekend, but I think that he's going to try to get around enough to put the games I sim on the site each day (I guess today's might be tomorrow).
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 12:57 am
I may be out of town, but I'll sure as hell make sure boxes get up. They should be up momentarily.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:09 pm
Nope. The process was still mishandled, but we're working on improving it. The reasons are still invalid IMO, but what can you do...Twins wrote:So do you take back your little bitchfest from earlier this week?
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:23 pm
Far more valid than your logic for making the Sept/oct trading 08.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 2:04 pm
That's the great thing about opinions, they don't have to be logical.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 2:18 pm
I'm glad you openly admit that your opinion is illogical. Why have an important vote in league matters if you admit to not using logic? This is baffling.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 2:29 pm
It was a joke, as I already told you. I've given my logic and I'm not going to rehash the same arguments, pro and con AGAIN. The vote was held, a decision was made. Case closed.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:02 pm
Oh ok. What about when people said that to you about simming? You threw a bitchfest that rivals if not surpasses mine.RedSox wrote:It was a joke, as I already told you. I've given my logic and I'm not going to rehash the same arguments, pro and con AGAIN. The vote was held, a decision was made. Case closed.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 6:31 pm
You mean the vote that had no debate? Versus this one that has been debated ad nauseum with the same arguments thrown out there over and over again? Yes, I can see the parallel there...
Everyone had a chance to voice their opinion, we voted, trading will occur in 2008.
Everyone had a chance to voice their opinion, we voted, trading will occur in 2008.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:23 pm
Bren, I think you should take this statement back, because it is EXACTLY what happened with regards to simming. Everyone had a chance to voice their opinion (whether or not they did is not my fault, I sure chimed in), we voted and it was a pressing issue so it goes into effect for 2007.[/b]RedSox wrote:Everyone had a chance to voice their opinion, we voted, trading will occur in 2008.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:33 pm
Do you really want to turn this into another public argument?Dodgers wrote:Bren, I think you should take this statement back, because it is EXACTLY what happened with regards to simming. Everyone had a chance to voice their opinion (whether or not they did is not my fault, I sure chimed in), we voted and it was a pressing issue so it goes into effect for 2007.[/b]RedSox wrote:Everyone had a chance to voice their opinion, we voted, trading will occur in 2008.
1. There wasn't a resonable public debate and everyone knows it.
2. Just because I screwed up (which i admit to doing) doesn't make it ok to act that way.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:08 pm
There hasn't been a reasonable public debate over a lot of things lately. Unless skirting this issue and failing to answer very direct questions about your position qualifies as reasonable public debate.RedSox wrote:
1. There wasn't a resonable public debate and everyone knows it.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:54 pm
I've given my position, several time, you guys just don't like it. nothing I can do about that.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 3:33 pm
Sorry about the delay in boxes, they're up now for Monday/Tuesday.
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 7:29 am
Who's doing the simming this week? I want to make sure I get Johan out of the rotation when/if I clinch a playoff spot.