Page 1 of 1
Odd Question
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:18 pm
by Royals
Please answer honestly. This comes from a discussion with another GM. No one will know who answers the question which way, i'm locking the detailed results as 'hidden'.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:20 pm
by Orioles
I clicked the wrong one. Time to lay off the cheeba.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:21 pm
by Orioles
I don't know what "argumentative" means.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:25 pm
by Cardinals
argumentative (N.) Bren Dillon
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:50 pm
by Royals
Astros wrote:argumentative (N.) Bren Dillon
Shhhhh! You're not supposed to give it away!
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 4:57 pm
by Royals
Orioles wrote:I don't know what "argumentative" means.
Wait... didn't you just take the freakin bar exam???
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:00 pm
by Orioles
I was being facetious (I don't know what that means either, really). I clicked on "no to argumentative" instead of "Yes to both" by accident.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:02 pm
by Orioles
RedSox wrote:Orioles wrote:I don't know what "argumentative" means.
Wait... didn't you just take the freakin bar exam???
I took it. Doesn't mean I passed. Any jackass can take it.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:02 pm
by Athletics
Orioles wrote:RedSox wrote:Orioles wrote:I don't know what "argumentative" means.
Wait... didn't you just take the freakin bar exam???
I took it. Doesn't mean I passed. Any jackass can take it.
He just called himself a jackass.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 5:04 pm
by Orioles
That was the implication. Mostly a jackass for taking it in the first place. By the time I get the results, I might be in another industry.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:22 pm
by Royals
At least you can say you passed it though.
If you pass it.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:16 pm
by Orioles
Well, I passed CT. And the J.D. might actually earn me a bump in title/salary at the consulting gigs I'm looking at, so I won't be paying back loans for the next 20 years for nothing (hopefully).
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:41 pm
by Cardinals
Welcome to CT brosef
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:59 pm
by Nationals
Now that's a silly question, if I've ever heard one.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:35 pm
by Cardinals
Does the majority of the league really know both these words? I'm shocked at all you liars.
Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:17 pm
by Mets
Astros wrote:Does the majority of the league really know both these words? I'm shocked at all you liars.
Are you being argumentative?
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:29 pm
by Yankees
I'll be argumentative - there isn't a snowballs chance in hell that 24 hours ago, if we sat you all in an amphitheatre half of you know what irreverent means...
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:15 pm
by Padres
Royals wrote:I'll be argumentative - there isn't a snowballs chance in hell that 24 hours ago, if we sat you all in an amphitheatre half of you know what irreverent means...
Z - Irreverent is a word I have had to use too may times - unfortunately when addressing my childrens' behavior; when dealing with employees' (mis)behavior while I was representing management; in school when substitute teaching for an unpopular teacher, etc. It is also a word that has (unfortunately) been used to describe my own behavior once or twice - at least once in print.
Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:56 pm
by Yankees
Pretty much why I went with half...
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:40 am
by Royals
Who do you think doens't know the meaning of the word irreverent? or argumentative?
See, this whole thing started when Z said he wasn't impressed by my use of those two 'big words'. I don't consider them big words, he didn't think half the members in the league would know what they both meant.
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:21 pm
by Yankees
Camera opens to a shot of dashing Brett Zalaski with midget Bren Dillon.
Camera shifts to oncoming Greyhound bus. Camera slowly pans back to Brett and Bren.
Bren pushes Brett in front of bus.
End Scene.