Roster Size?

Moderator: Executive Committee

Post Reply
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 7730
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Roster Size?

Post by Cardinals »

John asked if we're on 28 man rosters while we do the accelerated simming. I don't have a real preference. We don't have pitch counts but I also don't really care either way here. What do you all think?
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
User avatar
Reds
Posts: 3421
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:00 am

Re: Roster Size?

Post by Reds »

Since it’s only done to save the pitchers in the MLB I don’t really see the point.. unless we think it’ll make things easier as we accelerate the sim. It could lead to more players playing who are injured ;-) :lol:
User avatar
Marlins
Posts: 3588
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Congers, NY
Name: Nils

Re: Roster Size?

Post by Marlins »

Agreed, the reasons that MLB is doing do not really apply to us. But at the same time I dont really care either way.
User avatar
Guardians
Posts: 4624
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Name: Pat Gillespie

Re: Roster Size?

Post by Guardians »

26
User avatar
Padres
Site Admin
Posts: 4397
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Wells, Maine
Name: Jim Berger

Re: Roster Size?

Post by Padres »

I'd prefer 28 for the first month (even better until we get caught up) but I'll support whatever the eventual decision is ...
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 7730
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Re: Roster Size?

Post by Cardinals »

Let's stay at 26.

I agree with Ken, this leads to the potential for more injured players playing.
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
Post Reply

Return to “ExCo General”