CBA -> IBC: NL DH
Moderator: Executive Committee
Re: CBA -> IBC: NL DH
Seconded.
-
Guardians
- Posts: 4624
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:00 am
- Location: Tallahassee, FL
- Name: Pat Gillespie
Re: CBA -> IBC: NL DH
Agree, but can DMB handle this? Is there a setting to make dh universal?
-
Padres
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4397
- Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 1:00 am
- Location: Wells, Maine
- Name: Jim Berger
Re: CBA -> IBC: NL DH
Okay ... if this were a league using last year's stats for this year's play (and there are such leagues) with players' plate appearances limited to their actual use, it could be problematic to implement this season. Since the IBC is a "projection" league we should have plenty of available plate appearances.
-
Cardinals
- Posts: 7730
- Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Manch Vegas, CT
- Name: John Paul Starkey
Re: CBA -> IBC: NL DH
We've never used the "playing time limits" functionality.WhiteSox wrote: ↑Fri Mar 11, 2022 1:51 pm Okay ... if this were a league using last year's stats for this year's play (and there are such leagues) with players' plate appearances limited to their actual use, it could be problematic to implement this season. Since the IBC is a "projection" league we should have plenty of available plate appearances.
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
-
Rangers
- Site Admin
- Posts: 3924
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:00 am
- Location: Prosper, TX
- Name: Brett Perryman
Re: CBA -> IBC: NL DH
I vote for this.
