Churchill has further updated his right-hand sidebar referencing the Reds possibility. He says the O's want Bailey, Votto, Cueto, and Edwin Encarnacion. This is particularly lopsided, and pushing Melvin Mora back to Cincy wouldn't make it any less so. Mora may have negative value at this point. Meanwhile John Fay says nothing new has happened on the Reds/Bedard front.
If the Reds are actually considering this deal then I don't even know what to think. With a package like that forget Bedard they could get Santana and more.
Reds
Moderator: Pirates
- Guardians
- Posts: 1913
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 8:00 am
- Location: Homer Glen, IL
- Name: Larry Langellier
Re: Reds
Except Santana holds th power to veto a trade--I don't think he'd take to going to Cincinnati (although I'd love to see that package go to the Twins)Brewers wrote:Churchill has further updated his right-hand sidebar referencing the Reds possibility. He says the O's want Bailey, Votto, Cueto, and Edwin Encarnacion. This is particularly lopsided, and pushing Melvin Mora back to Cincy wouldn't make it any less so. Mora may have negative value at this point. Meanwhile John Fay says nothing new has happened on the Reds/Bedard front.
If the Reds are actually considering this deal then I don't even know what to think. With a package like that forget Bedard they could get Santana and more.
- Reds
- Posts: 3958
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:00 am
- Mets
- Posts: 2391
- Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:00 am
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Name: John Anderson
- Contact:




















