ZIPS Bidding Budgets

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:43 am

Angels $30
Players Awarded:

Astros: $30
Players Awarded:

Athletics: $0
Players Awarded:
Wade LeBlanc, $30, 1/26

Blue Jays: $30
Players Awarded:

Braves: $30
Players Awarded:

Brewers: $30
Players Awarded:

Cardinals: $30
Players Awarded:

Cubs: $0
Players Awarded:
Vidal Nuno, $30, 1/12

DBacks: $30
Players Awarded:

Dodgers: $0
Players Awarded:
Cesar Valdez, $30, 1/26

Giants: $30
Players Awarded:

Indians: $26
Players Awarded:
Rowan Wick, $3, 1/13
Richie Shaffer, $1, 1/19

Mariners: $30
Players Awarded:

Marlins: $30
Players Awarded:

Mets: $30
Players Awarded:

Nationals: $28
Players Awarded:
Kyle Blanks, $1, 12/26
Chad Huffman, $1, 1/15

Orioles: $30
Players Awarded:

Padres: $30
Players Awarded:

Philles: $30
Players Awarded:

Pirates: $30
Players Awarded:

Rangers: $0
Players Awarded:
A.J. Minter, $30, 12/13

Rays: $30
Players Awarded:

Reds: $18
Players Awarded:
Kirby Yates, $12, 12/24

Red Sox: $30
Players Awarded:

Rockies: $0
Players Awarded:
Evan Scribner, $30, 12/30

Royals: $30
Players Awarded:

Tigers: $30
Players Awarded:

Twins: $21
Players Awarded:
Joe Thatcher, $2, 11/29
Mike Hauschild, $7, 12/11

White Sox: $15
Players Awarded:
Jake Petricka, $15, 1/5

Yankees: $19
Players Awarded:
Rafael De Paula, $11, 12/3

Royals · Post by **Royals** » Tue Nov 08, 2016 3:17 pm

This is idiotic. Just put them on waivers.

Phillies · Post by **Phillies** » Tue Nov 08, 2016 5:41 pm

I don't see why it's idiotic. Gives us something to do the next month and a half. It's boring around here.

Guardians · Post by **Guardians** » Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:54 pm

Phillies wrote:I don't see why it's idiotic. Gives us something to do the next month and a half. It's boring around here.

We're playing music too loud and we're on Bren's yard...

Astros · Post by **Astros** » Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:48 pm

Tigers wrote:
Phillies wrote:I don't see why it's idiotic. Gives us something to do the next month and a half. It's boring around here.
We're playing music too loud and we're on Bren's yard...

To be fair he was also bitching about a joke John made on facebook so he's just extra pissy today

BlueJays · Post by **BlueJays** » Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:19 am

for the record, I'm not opposing the system, just stating that it seems complicated to manage, so I hope you guys have a good system ready

I typically find players are on waivers for a reason; it's pretty rare any of them are worth a damn. I just hope we're not creating a lot of work for the ExCo just to make sure the right team lands players like Dixon Machado...

Royals · Post by **Royals** » Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:27 am

Cardinals wrote:
Tigers wrote:
Phillies wrote:I don't see why it's idiotic. Gives us something to do the next month and a half. It's boring around here.
We're playing music too loud and we're on Bren's yard...
To be fair he was also bitching about a joke John made on facebook so he's just extra pissy today

How many years did it take to get the IBC Rules updated? 6? 7? And the ExCo wants to try to manage this system rather than just relying on waivers? Yeah, that was well thought out.

Shouldn't a change this significant require a league vote? An entire new system is being added.

Phillies · Post by **Phillies** » Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:39 am

Anything is better than "I work at a computer all day, I clicked his name first, I win." This isn't a big deal.

BlueJays · Post by **BlueJays** » Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:42 am

all I want to know is when will I receive my $30 check?

Nationals · Post by **Nationals** » Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:13 am

Padres wrote:
Cardinals wrote:
Tigers wrote: We're playing music too loud and we're on Bren's yard...
To be fair he was also bitching about a joke John made on facebook so he's just extra pissy today
How many years did it take to get the IBC Rules updated? 6? 7? And the ExCo wants to try to manage this system rather than just relying on waivers? Yeah, that was well thought out.

Shouldn't a change this significant require a league vote? An entire new system is being added.

I don't really understand the hate here.

This seems like a fully transparent system, where you have a budget that is public knowledge and teams are making public bids.

The entire amount of oversight is updating the budgets as they are used and making sure no one exceeds their budget (which I'm assuming competing teams would do also if you're bidding on the same guy since the bids are transparent).

Royals · Post by **Royals** » Thu Nov 10, 2016 10:59 am

Twins wrote:
Padres wrote:
Cardinals wrote: To be fair he was also bitching about a joke John made on facebook so he's just extra pissy today
How many years did it take to get the IBC Rules updated? 6? 7? And the ExCo wants to try to manage this system rather than just relying on waivers? Yeah, that was well thought out.

Shouldn't a change this significant require a league vote? An entire new system is being added.
I don't really understand the hate here.

This seems like a fully transparent system, where you have a budget that is public knowledge and teams are making public bids.

The entire amount of oversight is updating the budgets as they are used and making sure no one exceeds their budget (which I'm assuming competing teams would do also if you're bidding on the same guy since the bids are transparent).

It is transparent. It also wasn't discussed with the league, no options were put forward or requested, and no vote was held.