Draft Rosters

The place to come to talk about all things IBC related. Or not IBC related. Just keep it reasonably respectful.
Post Reply
User avatar
Reds
Posts: 3802
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:00 am

Draft Rosters

Post by Reds »

Have we relaxed the league rule that requires no more than 40 players unless they are inactive draftees from the last two drafts?
Top
User avatar
Guardians
Posts: 5137
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Name: Pat Gillespie

Post by Guardians »

I think the issue is Shawn hasn't gotten around to moving rosters around. Quite a few 14/15 guys have projections, so they're not showing up on the draft roster.
Top
User avatar
Mets
Posts: 2366
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Name: John Anderson
Contact:
Contact Mets

Re: Draft Rosters

Post by Mets »

Reds wrote:Have we relaxed the league rule that requires no more than 40 players unless they are inactive draftees from the last two drafts?
why do we have this rule again?
2008-2023 Mets: 1,143-1,296...469%
2006-2008 Rockies: 242-244...498%

IBC Total: 1,385-1,540...474%
2022: lost WC
2023: lost WC
2024: 1st NL East; lost WC
Top
User avatar
Giants
Posts: 3532
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Arizona
Name: Mark Dusick

Post by Giants »

Primarily to annoy the GMs who always complain about it
2025 All-Star Break - SF Giants
Top
User avatar
Mets
Posts: 2366
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Name: John Anderson
Contact:
Contact Mets

Post by Mets »

..oh - that's good. I thought there was a logical answer such as trying to do our best attempt at having an actual 40-man roster.
2008-2023 Mets: 1,143-1,296...469%
2006-2008 Rockies: 242-244...498%

IBC Total: 1,385-1,540...474%
2022: lost WC
2023: lost WC
2024: 1st NL East; lost WC
Top
User avatar
WhiteSox
Posts: 1353
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Name: Aaron Dorman

Post by WhiteSox »

Why not just make it 55 man rosters, no draft roster spots :)
Top
User avatar
Cubs
Posts: 1875
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Chicago
Name: Pat Bishop

Post by Cubs »

Yankees wrote:Why not just make it 55 man rosters, no draft roster spots :)
Make it 60 or add another year of protection, and eliminate the can't be used in SIM rule - no need for a penalty for drafting well.
Top
User avatar
Rangers
Site Admin
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Prosper, TX
Name: Brett Perryman

Post by Rangers »

Cubs wrote:
Yankees wrote:Why not just make it 55 man rosters, no draft roster spots :)
Make it 60 or add another year of protection, and eliminate the can't be used in SIM rule - no need for a penalty for drafting well.
I'm for any of these over the current one but we've lost the vote each time a change to rosters has been presented.
Top
User avatar
Dodgers
Site Admin
Posts: 5786
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Name: Shawn Walsh

Post by Dodgers »

Tigers wrote:I think the issue is Shawn hasn't gotten around to moving rosters around. Quite a few 14/15 guys have projections, so they're not showing up on the draft roster.
Just moved all the '13 guys to Inactive status.
Top
User avatar
Royals
Posts: 4125
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Englewood, FL
Name: Larry Bestwick

Post by Royals »

Rangers wrote:I'm for any of these over the current one but we've lost the vote each time a change to rosters has been presented.
That's because there's about as much need for an expanded roster as there is for an expanded draft.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “IBC Forum”