Replacing pittsburgh

Royals · Post by **Royals** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:18 am

It's been 2 weeks since I warned Pittsburgh about submitting a roster and I believe JP said something to him as well and he STILL has not submitted a roster. He has more DL violations than any other GM. How long does this guy have to be negligent before he gets the boot?

Giants · Post by **Giants** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:37 am

Ouch. Does he know how to submit a roster?

Royals · Post by **Royals** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:03 am

If you didn't know how to submit a roster, would you sit there and continue to not send one in after you had been told you almost lost your spot in the league for not sending one in? or would you ask someone how to do it?

Dodgers · Post by **Dodgers** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 11:48 am

Although this new poll basically makes the whole last poll's results totally pointless, I'll vote for a goner so that the impending minidraft gets a bit larger...while we're at it, haven't really heard much from Texas lately, what's the deal with him? I don't really remember when we brought him in either, but with WAS/PIT/CLE already in the minidraft if Texas isn't working out then we should probably look at canning him too--if we manage to pull 2 or 3 solid gms for this minidraft then we may not have another minidraft for quite some time.

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:40 pm

Texas can be contacted with ease via IM.

How is Cleveland in the minidraft? He was voted 4-2 to be booted, which means he stays. He needed 5 boot votes to go. There's only one vacant team, and thats the Nats.

Dodgers · Post by **Dodgers** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:42 pm

Well then I change my vote. I was clueless about Texas, which is why I asked. Lets get a Nats gm in here then...oh wait we already had a more than adequate one in Paul...

Dodgers · Post by **Dodgers** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:46 pm

Oh and if Bren is going to go after Pitt like this I'm going after Craig, he needs to go, besides one trade with Bren before the year, his last move in January 11th and he hasn't made a single post on the board. I'm all for solid gms who submit lineups, but we can't start having a bunch of rocks who have no desire to turn over their roster at all.

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:09 pm

Seems like both are complete opposites that are deemed detrimental to the league by some.

Ryan doesnt submit lineups apparently, but does talk trade and occasionaly (rarely, ok, very rarely) posts on the board and does try to improve his team.

Craig is content being mediocre and hasn't even made a FA signing. Or post...besides the Peavy trade.

Which is worse: The GM who doesn't submit lineups or the GM that has the activity of a rock?

Giants · Post by **Giants** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:11 pm

Look, it's been explained to Pittsburgh that he has to submit rosters. He still hasn't done it. Not sure what else needs to said. I'll now vote for him going.

Cardinals · Post by **Cardinals** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:39 pm

you voted for him to stay in the poll.

Royals · Post by **Royals** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:18 pm

Tex has been very good about submitting rosters. Cleveland and Pit are at different ends of the spectrum. The difference is that what Pittsburgh doesn't do, has penalties and direct adverse effects on the league. Cleveland is quiet, but as JP and I both know, he's not unreachable.

IBC

Replacing pittsburgh

Should Pittsburgh be replaced?

Replacing pittsburgh