umm....what?

Gabe Hammad's blog. Gabe was a member between 2002-2015 and again in 2017. During his tenure, Gabe won the NL East in 2005-06 and the 2006 IBC Championship.

Moderator: DBacks

User avatar
DBacks
Posts: 2085
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Rogers, MN
Name: Dave Mueller

umm....what?

Post by DBacks »

Brad Pitt and his Ocean's Eleven director Steven Soderbergh are set to reteam for a movie adaptation of Michael Lewis' bestselling book Moneyball: The Art Of Winning An Unfair Game. Soderbergh is in talks to direct the film, in which Pitt is slated to star as Oakland Athletics baseball coach Billy Beane.

Lewis' book chronicles the complicated computer analysis system Beane used to create a team that regularly contended for baseball's World Series.
User avatar
Royals
Posts: 3948
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Englewood, FL
Name: Larry Bestwick

Post by Royals »

Gabe, have you been reading the Onion again?
User avatar
Giants
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:00 am
Name: Jake Hamlin
Contact:

Post by Giants »

I guess this was only a local story but I thought it got more national press, they've been talking about it here for more than a year. I'm not entirely sure what the angle of the movie is going to be, but if they can get McLovin to play Paul DePodesta I'm in.
User avatar
Royals
Posts: 3948
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Englewood, FL
Name: Larry Bestwick

Post by Royals »

As a joke, this is hilarious. As a serious news item... kind of sad. This has to be the worst idea for a movie since Gigli...
User avatar
Giants
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:00 am
Name: Jake Hamlin
Contact:

Post by Giants »

You Don't Mess With the Zohan was a much worse movie idea than this. This is actually fairly easy to fit into the sports movie mold, beginning is Beane failing as a baseball player and working his way up the scouting food chain, bulk of the movie is people aligning against him and saying he's the underdog, triumph of making the playoffs in spite of the obstacles, tragedy is slide Jeremy, slide plus Giambi signs with the Yankees, denouement is Beane is still at it finding new ways to win in spite of the odds.
User avatar
Yankees
Posts: 4247
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Fulshear, TX
Name: Brett Zalaski
Contact:

Post by Yankees »

Yea, I'm not sure how this is the worst idea for a movie since Gigli. Have you seen some of the bullshit out of Hollywood lately? Any sports movies that aren't about cheerleading or Will Ferrell? I'm all for it...
User avatar
Royals
Posts: 3948
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Englewood, FL
Name: Larry Bestwick

Post by Royals »

Maybe it depends on your perspective on Moneyball. I never thought the book was that good (was bored after the first chapter and stopped reading it) and I've long thought Beane was overrated as a GM (largely due to Moneyball).
User avatar
Astros
Posts: 2977
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: PHX
Name: Ty Bradley

Post by Astros »

We had this big ice storm the past 2 weeks and I guess hell froze over because of it, cause holy shit I agree with Bren on something. Moneyball is a very boring read. 200 something pages of "Billy Beane is great because he signed Chad Bradford, Billy Beane is great because he drafted Jeremy Brown, Billy Beane is a genius because he traded Jeremy Bonderman."
User avatar
Royals
Posts: 3948
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Englewood, FL
Name: Larry Bestwick

Post by Royals »

Cardinals wrote:We had this big ice storm the past 2 weeks and I guess hell froze over because of it, cause holy shit I agree with Bren on something. Moneyball is a very boring read. 200 something pages of "Billy Beane is great because he signed Chad Bradford, Billy Beane is great because he drafted Jeremy Brown, Billy Beane is a genius because he traded Jeremy Bonderman."
This seems to be happening a lot more since I stopped being Commish/ExCo. Causation is hard to prove, but I've definitely been less stressed in regards to the IBC, so a correlation seems to make sense.
User avatar
Giants
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:00 am
Name: Jake Hamlin
Contact:

Post by Giants »

It's not surprising that you two found Moneyball boring. It isn't a baseball book, it's a business book that happens to be about baseball. If you're expecting something like Summer of '49 you're going to be very disappointed in it.
User avatar
Royals
Posts: 3948
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Englewood, FL
Name: Larry Bestwick

Post by Royals »

I have no problem with the business aspect of it, I always read BP's business columns and frequently flip through the WSJ and local/market-specific business stuff at work. I just didn't think it was all that well written and Beane's ego shone through. It's not that interesting a read if you don't buy into the "Billy Beane is a genius" perspective.
User avatar
Yankees
Posts: 4247
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Fulshear, TX
Name: Brett Zalaski
Contact:

Post by Yankees »

Athletics wrote:It's not surprising that you two found Moneyball boring. It isn't a baseball book, it's a business book that happens to be about baseball. If you're expecting something like Summer of '49 you're going to be very disappointed in it.
Yup...that's all I got.
User avatar
Giants
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:00 am
Name: Jake Hamlin
Contact:

Post by Giants »

RedSox wrote:I have no problem with the business aspect of it, I always read BP's business columns and frequently flip through the WSJ and local/market-specific business stuff at work. I just didn't think it was all that well written and Beane's ego shone through. It's not that interesting a read if you don't buy into the "Billy Beane is a genius" perspective.
Sure, but those articles are written for baseball fans. Moneyball isn't, it's just Liar's Poker with baseball characters. Also, Beane definitely isn't an overrated GM (he's certainly nowhere near as overrated as Theo), what I think is much more interesting is that the two low payroll teams who have consistently competed since the Yankee spending went crazy, the A's and the Twins, seem to have exactly the opposite sort of philosophy to do it. With all the attention placed on Oakland's statistical analysis I've been curious why there hasn't been much written on why the gamer-ness of the Twins has continually resulted in success while the gamer-ness of other teams (like a certain Bay Area baseball team that was so gritty it put gamer into the slogan) has not.
User avatar
Royals
Posts: 3948
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Englewood, FL
Name: Larry Bestwick

Post by Royals »

The WSJ isn't written for baseball fans either, at least Moneyball has baseball as a setting.
You may not have noticed, but the a's aren't competing against the Yankees. They're competing against the Rangers and mariners (two badly run orgs) and the Angels, who only recently got decent management and the A's haven't won a playoff series in 18 years. getting to the playoffs is pretty meaningless in that context.
User avatar
Yankees
Posts: 4247
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Fulshear, TX
Name: Brett Zalaski
Contact:

Post by Yankees »

RedSox wrote:The WSJ isn't written for baseball fans either, at least Moneyball has baseball as a setting.
You may not have noticed, but the a's aren't competing against the Yankees. They're competing against the Rangers and mariners (two badly run orgs) and the Angels, who only recently got decent management and the A's haven't won a playoff series in 18 years. getting to the playoffs is pretty meaningless in that context.
Did Billy Beane piss in your cereal? Did you ever really read the book?

The book isn't so much a handjob to Beane, as it is talking about finding undervalued skills and paying to get the most out of the dollar amount available.

So Billy Beane was smarter and better then the Rangers, Mariners, and Angels - isn't that what he's paid to do? This whole argument over, "it doesn't work in the playoffs" is bullshit for two reasons.
1) He is up against teams with upwards of 3x the amount of payroll who are built to dominate in short series playoff settings...
2) It's the goddamn playoffs - The Marlins won the World Series, the Cardinals were awful and then played in the World Series...etc etc etc...

You sound like Joe Morgan and the other 3,500 hundred people who think Billy Beane wrote the book...
User avatar
Padres
Site Admin
Posts: 4382
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Wells, Maine
Name: Jim Berger

Post by Padres »

Royals wrote:Did Billy Beane piss in your cereal? Did you ever really read the book?
RedSox wrote: I never thought the book was that good (was bored after the first chapter and stopped reading it) ...
Perhaps not asked ... but already answered ...
User avatar
Astros
Posts: 2977
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: PHX
Name: Ty Bradley

Post by Astros »

Royals wrote: 2) It's the goddamn playoffs - The Marlins won the World Series, the Cardinals were awful and then played in the World Series...etc etc etc...
That was not a bad Cardinals team. Game 1 of the NLDS against the Padres was the first time since the BEGINNING OF MAY that the team had a fully healthy lineup. There were times that year that, due to injury, So Taguchi hit cleanup. So Taguchi!
User avatar
Giants
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:00 am
Name: Jake Hamlin
Contact:

Post by Giants »

RedSox wrote:The WSJ isn't written for baseball fans either, at least Moneyball has baseball as a setting.
You may not have noticed, but the a's aren't competing against the Yankees. They're competing against the Rangers and mariners (two badly run orgs) and the Angels, who only recently got decent management and the A's haven't won a playoff series in 18 years. getting to the playoffs is pretty meaningless in that context.
Come on dude, the A's swept the Twins in the 2006 divisional round (that's more recently than the Yankees have won a playoff series). Jim, great catch on Bren only reading the first chapter. The first chapter of Moneyball is all about Beane's playing career or lack thereof. That's like judging the New Testament based solely on the Creation story. The Mariners have been a mess during the Bavasi era, but during the years Moneyball covers they were very credibly run by Pat Gillick. Arte Moreno bought the Angels in 2003, but they were credible all the way back in 2000 when Scoscia took over. Oh well, never let the facts get in the way of Bren disliking something other people like.
User avatar
Astros
Posts: 2977
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: PHX
Name: Ty Bradley

Post by Astros »

Jake, the Creation story is in Genesis, which is in the Old Testament
User avatar
Rockies
Posts: 2552
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Denver, CO
Name: Nate Hunter
Contact:

Post by Rockies »

It's rare that a non-fiction sports book is written about a team that never won a championship under this strategy, and many of the players hailed as great finds had yet to be proven. While it's an interesting strategy that has no doubt changed the face of baseball, Billy Beane's success was not what I would say is deserving of a 300 page biopic/praise of the job he's done in Oakland
User avatar
Padres
Site Admin
Posts: 4382
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Wells, Maine
Name: Jim Berger

Post by Padres »

Cardinals wrote:Jake, the Creation story is in Genesis, which is in the Old Testament
now c'mon Aaron ... confusing "begats" and creation is not a stretch in a thread that originally dealt with a proposed movie :lol:
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 7687
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Post by Cardinals »

I thought MoneyBall was an alright read. Wasn't horrible, wasn't great. It was okay. Interesting enough for a read at the beach last year.
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
User avatar
Padres
Site Admin
Posts: 4382
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Wells, Maine
Name: Jim Berger

Post by Padres »

Each generation has its own book(s) looking at the business of baseball ... for better or worse Moneyball is one of those books for a generation just as Veeck as in Wreck was for my generation. Neither are the gospel ... neither are the be-all to end-all. Both exaggerate the influence of the respective main character - however, both main characters deserve to have a book written about their exploits and efforts.

Both were nice one time reads for me that are a part of baseball history as was Roger Kahn's Boys of Summer, David Halberstam's The Teammates and countless other books.
User avatar
Giants
Posts: 3461
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:00 am
Name: Jake Hamlin
Contact:

Post by Giants »

Cardinals wrote:Jake, the Creation story is in Genesis, which is in the Old Testament
Aaron, that's precisely my point. Bren judged Moneyball on the chapter discussing Billy Beane's playing career, a chapter which has little to no bearing on the rest of the book except that its on the first page, kind of like how the Creation story has little to no bearing on the New Testament.
User avatar
Astros
Posts: 2977
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: PHX
Name: Ty Bradley

Post by Astros »

Oh okay, I thought you just had a brain fart
Locked

Return to “The Cub Hub”