Potential 2021 Changes

These announcements are reflected on the front page.
Post Reply
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 7719
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Cardinals »

As you all know, we historically mirror Major League Baseball and its rule changes, notably adding the second wild card, the 10-day IL and the 26-man roster in recent years.

There is a very real possibility that the universal DH expands to the NL permanently in the MLB, and that there may be new playoffs in the MLB after this year. Whether or not you believe what Manfred said about it is another thing, but it's undoubtedly on the table in some capacity.

No decisions have been made for what we'll do for 2021, but be advised that we historically mirror MLB. This season, it was far too late for us to do so as the DH and playoff changes were made at the midway point of this season.
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
User avatar
Giants
Posts: 3463
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:00 am
Name: Jake Hamlin
Contact:

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Giants »

I was surprised how into the universal DH I was. I think the 3 batter rule for relievers put enough strategy in that I didn’t miss it. Heartily endorse following mlb if this is indeed a permanent rule change.
Your REIGNING AND DEFENDING #evenyear IBC CHAMPION

2015- #torture #evenyears 179-145
2006-2014 Gritty Gutty A's 828-631
2005 Texas Rangers 65-97
Total: 1072-873 .551
User avatar
Athletics
Posts: 1872
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:00 am
Location: San Diego, CA
Name: Stephen d'Esterhazy

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Athletics »

Giants wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 10:05 pm I was surprised how into the universal DH I was. I think the 3 batter rule for relievers put enough strategy in that I didn’t miss it. Heartily endorse following mlb if this is indeed a permanent rule change.
How do you enforce the three batter rule if DMB doesn't release a v12 with that option?
"My shit doesn't work in the playoffs. My job is to get us to the playoffs. What happens after that is fucking luck."

LAA 11 - 15 331W - 479L
LAA 16 - 20 477W - 333L 17-20 ALW
OAK 21 - 22 214W - 110L 21-22 ALW
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 7719
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Cardinals »

Yeah, that would require a DMB update. If they provide that, then it will be on the table.
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
User avatar
DBacks
Posts: 2091
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Rogers, MN
Name: Dave Mueller

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by DBacks »

I really don't like the playoff changes as it is purely a money grab - it makes absolutely no sense to play a 162-game season if they are just going to let 1/2 the league into the playoffs. There is no way the #1 seed should be 2 games away from losing to the #8 seed. An average team beating a great team 2 out of 3 happens quite often in baseball.

None of the other changes bother me other than the 3-batter rule for relievers, which I don't really like, but I can live with it.
User avatar
Phillies
Posts: 2921
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Name: Nick Perry

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Phillies »

New playoff format - I am a hard NO
DH to NL - I am a hard YES
3 batter rule - stupid, NO
User avatar
Marlins
Posts: 3578
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Congers, NY
Name: Nils

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Marlins »

I am of the opinion we should adopt any changes MLB makes unless there is substantial reason not to (or, just impossible to implement for some reason). While I may agree/disagree with some of these new things, I think its just a slippery slope to go down to not implement anything just because we dont feel like it. So, my vote is, and always will be, to mirror any changes MLB makes as long as we can (for instance with the 3 batter rule).
User avatar
Nationals
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2016 8:00 am
Location: West Hartford, CT
Name: Ian Schnaufer

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Nationals »

Marlins wrote: Mon Oct 05, 2020 12:51 pm I am of the opinion we should adopt any changes MLB makes unless there is substantial reason not to (or, just impossible to implement for some reason). While I may agree/disagree with some of these new things, I think its just a slippery slope to go down to not implement anything just because we dont feel like it. So, my vote is, and always will be, to mirror any changes MLB makes as long as we can (for instance with the 3 batter rule).
I agree with this sentiment.
User avatar
Mets
Posts: 2270
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Atlanta, GA
Name: John Anderson
Contact:

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Mets »

Unless there is new DMB release it will not be possible to enforce the 3-batter rule, to my knowledge.
2008-2023 Mets: 1,054-1,223...463%
2006-2008 Rockies: 242-244...498%

IBC Total: 1,296-1,467...469%
2022: lost WC
2023: lost WC
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 7719
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Cardinals »

Mets wrote: Mon Oct 05, 2020 6:10 pm Unless there is new DMB release it will not be possible to enforce the 3-batter rule, to my knowledge.
Correct, this isn't doable unless DMB releases a patch. They could - they used to more in the past, but who knows.
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
User avatar
Dodgers
Site Admin
Posts: 5767
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 1:00 am
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Name: Shawn Walsh

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Dodgers »

Pirates wrote: Tue Oct 06, 2020 9:50 am
Mets wrote: Mon Oct 05, 2020 6:10 pm Unless there is new DMB release it will not be possible to enforce the 3-batter rule, to my knowledge.
Correct, this isn't doable unless DMB releases a patch. They could - they used to more in the past, but who knows.
Not holding my breath, this is from May: https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/dmbforu ... tml#p61956
User avatar
Marlins
Posts: 3578
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Congers, NY
Name: Nils

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Marlins »

I think it should come down to: when MLB makes a new rule, "I dont like it" shouldn't be reason at all to not implement it. "We can't actually do it due to constraints outside our control" is reason to not do it, until we are able to.
User avatar
Cardinals
Posts: 7719
Joined: Sat May 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Manch Vegas, CT
Name: John Paul Starkey

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Cardinals »

Marlins wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 7:50 am I think it should come down to: when MLB makes a new rule, "I dont like it" shouldn't be reason at all to not implement it. "We can't actually do it due to constraints outside our control" is reason to not do it, until we are able to.
Agreed
12, 14, 15, 17, 22
User avatar
Guardians
Posts: 4615
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:00 am
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Name: Pat Gillespie

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Guardians »

User avatar
Athletics
Posts: 1872
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:00 am
Location: San Diego, CA
Name: Stephen d'Esterhazy

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Athletics »

Fuck the runner on 2nd rule!
"My shit doesn't work in the playoffs. My job is to get us to the playoffs. What happens after that is fucking luck."

LAA 11 - 15 331W - 479L
LAA 16 - 20 477W - 333L 17-20 ALW
OAK 21 - 22 214W - 110L 21-22 ALW
User avatar
Reds
Posts: 3418
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:00 am

Re: Potential 2021 Changes

Post by Reds »

Angels wrote: Thu Oct 22, 2020 1:47 pm Fuck the runner on 2nd rule!
Agreed. It’s stupid.
Post Reply

Return to “Announcements”